THE US IS CALLING FOR LAW AND ORDER..IS ANYONE ANSWERING?

THE USA IS VERY CLOSE TO BEING A LAWLESS SOCIETY. AT LEAST FOR SERIOUS CRIMINALS...

Prosecutorial Duty in the Age of Political Violence: Why Maximum Convictions Are Essential

Introduction

The United States stands at a crossroads. The assassination of Charlie Kirk, the rise of trans terrorism, and the violent campaigns waged under banners like Antifa and Black Lives Matter have exposed a deep fracture in our civic life. Political murder and homegrown terrorism are not just isolated crimes; they are direct assaults on the American Republic itself. How our justice system responds will determine whether law and order still govern this nation, or whether mob violence and ideological extremism continue to erode our institutions.

The Rule of Law Under Siege

During the Biden administration, Americans witnessed the collapse of prosecutorial will. Rioters who burned cities, attacked police precincts, and targeted federal courthouses were routinely released without serious consequence. Federal prosecutors, who once prided themselves on protecting the nation against organized subversive movements, often turned a blind eye to political violence so long as it came from the left. This selective enforcement has gutted the credibility of the Department of Justice.

The result has been a culture of impunity. Those willing to use violence to achieve political ends now operate under the assumption that the consequences will be minimal, if not nonexistent. That assumption is deadly for a republic that relies on public confidence in impartial law enforcement.

Why Maximum Convictions Are Necessary

Prosecutors must reestablish deterrence. In cases of political assassination or coordinated terror campaigns, there can be no middle ground. Seeking the harshest possible convictions — conspiracy, sedition, material support for terrorism, and accessory to murder — is not vengeance. It is a constitutional duty to preserve the rule of law.

1. Deterrence: Maximum convictions send an unmistakable message that political violence will be punished with the full weight of the state. Without deterrence, political extremists will escalate.

2. Restoring Trust: The American people must believe that their government will protect them from both foreign and domestic enemies. When prosecutors refuse to act decisively, they betray that trust.

3. Reasserting Equality Before the Law: If a right-wing attacker faces full prosecution while a left-wing mob is coddled, the justice system becomes a partisan tool rather than a neutral safeguard. Equal application of maximum charges restores balance.

The Role of Enablers

There is a dangerous new category of offender that must be addressed: the enabler. These are individuals who may not fire the weapon or throw the Molotov cocktail, but who deliberately interfere with the enforcement of the law, often tipping the scales in favor of criminals or terrorists.

• Enablers of Illegal Immigration Enforcement: In recent years, activist groups have physically interfered with ICE operations, even going so far as to assault federal officers attempting to execute lawful arrests. Yet arrests and prosecutions for these assaults remain conspicuously rare. Allowing enablers to block immigration enforcement with impunity not only undermines the rule of law — it emboldens extremists to escalate further.

• Enablers of Political Assassins and Trans Terrorists: The case of George Zinn illustrates the new frontier of this problem. By falsely claiming responsibility for the Charlie Kirk assassination in order to buy the real shooter time, Zinn did more than obstruct justice. He actively aided a political assassin in escaping law enforcement. Similarly, we now see enablers of trans terrorism — activists and allies who rationalize or cover for politically motivated violence committed under the banner of transgender identity. That goes well beyond protest; it is complicity in domestic terror. Prosecutors must treat such acts as accessory after the fact at a minimum, and where evidence allows, as conspiracy to obstruct justice or aid terrorism. Anything less sends the signal that aiding an assassin or shielding ideological violence is a petty crime rather than an existential threat to the Republic.

Enablers represent the connective tissue between violent actors and their success. To treat them lightly is to encourage a support network for political murder and terrorism to flourish.

The Cost of Weakness

Charging a political assassin’s accomplice only with obstruction of justice sends the wrong signal. It implies that misleading police during a manhunt for a murderer of a national figure is a minor procedural crime. In reality, such acts are deliberate contributions to the success of terrorism. Anything short of maximum prosecution communicates weakness and emboldens others to test the limits of state response.

Conclusion: A Call for Courage

The justice system’s credibility can only be rebuilt through strength and resolve. Federal and state prosecutors must treat political murder, trans terrorism, and organized terror not as common crimes but as existential threats. That requires aggressive charging decisions, pursuit of maximum penalties, and refusal to allow ideology to dictate outcomes.

America cannot survive as a republic if mobs dictate the limits of speech and politics at gunpoint. The only way to restore the rule of law — after years of erosion under Biden’s Department of Justice — is through prosecutorial courage. Maximum convictions are not just an option; they are the duty of every prosecutor who swore an oath to defend the Constitution.