IS FBI FINALLY CLEANING HOUSE?

From Reuters via the Colorad based Gazette. "FBI ousts ex-acting director, other agents, in latest purge, people briefed say".

Reuters makes it sound like a bad thing... but we know that millions of Trump voters, if not crying about Epstein, will see this as one of their ships coming in to port.

The history of the FBI as bully to the Us citizen's civil rights has a long and twisted tale andis surely far from over. That being said, Kas Patel and Dan Bongino finally get a thumbs up from our newsroom for this flurry of firings of possible bad actors that have haunted the halls of the Hoover Building fro far too long. The following is an illustration as to what is being started over at FBI and what, one would hope, is the beginning of the end for those working in a government capacity that think that they are above the law.

CONFIDENTIAL DOSSIER

Title: Personnel and Political Realignment within the FBI Post-January 6: A Strategic Dossier on the Purge of Internal Resistance

Prepared: August 7, 2025

I. Executive Summary

Since the January 6 Capitol riot, the Federal Bureau of Investigation has experienced significant internal upheaval. Under the direction of new FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy Dan Bongino, a sweeping purge of senior personnel linked to controversial domestic terrorism investigations and resistance to oversight has been carried out. This dossier outlines the timeline, context, and likely motivations behind these dismissals, with a focus on the roles of Brian Driscoll and Steven Jensen, as well as DOJ official Emil Bove.

The key strategic assessment: A covert ideological apparatus within the FBI and DOJ sought to insulate itself from Trump administration oversight, selectively enforce legal standards, and weaponize the label of "domestic terrorism" to suppress dissent. The current firings may represent an attempt not only to restore political neutrality but to isolate potential conspirators before deeper criminal or administrative exposure.

II. Key Subjects and Events

1. Brian Driscoll

• Former Acting FBI Director (January 2025–July 2025)

• Refused Trump-era demands to disclose names of agents working Jan. 6 investigations

• Removed August 2025 under vague claims of "loss of confidence"

2. Steven Jensen

• Head of Washington Field Office; led Domestic Terrorism division post-Jan. 6

• Criticized for overseeing operations that targeted Trump-aligned protestors

• Removed August 2025 with no formal cause stated

3. Emil Bove

• Former DOJ official; now federal appellate judge (confirmed July 2025)

• Authored 2023 memo accusing FBI leadership of insubordination for resisting Trump’s executive order on "weaponization"

4. Dan Bongino and Kash Patel

• Installed as Deputy and Director of the FBI in early 2025

• Leading extensive personnel reviews, polygraph testing, and reassignments

III. Timeline of Strategic Milestones

2020–2021

• FBI domestic terrorism focus begins with racial justice protests (Summer 2020)

• Jan. 6 riot triggers massive federal investigation and expansion of anti-extremism resources

• Capitol Siege Unit formed at FBI; DOJ pushes for wide prosecutorial net

2022–2023

• Internal resistance grows inside FBI against expanding Jan. 6 prosecutions

• DOJ official Emil Bove demands list of investigating agents in 2023; Driscoll and Kissane resist

• FBI provides anonymized IDs instead of names; DOJ labels action as insubordination

2024

• FBI Director Christopher Wray steps down

• Driscoll named Acting Director; Jensen promoted to Washington Field Office

• House Oversight begins receiving whistleblower reports of internal DOJ bias

2025

• Kash Patel and Dan Bongino take control of FBI in January

• February–July: Reassignments, forced retirements, and polygraph exams escalate

• August: Jensen and Driscoll terminated; FBI Agents Association raises due process alarm

IV. Strategic Implications

• Legal Containment: Removing compromised personnel may limit legal liability if future investigations uncover conspiracy or misconduct within DOJ/FBI ranks.

• Public Narrative Management: By labeling removals as due to “loss of confidence,” the FBI avoids immediate legal retaliation while signaling internal ideological recalibration.

• Operational Security: The use of polygraph exams and internal demotions suggests concern over leaks, divided loyalties, or ideological subversion.

V. Recommendations for Further Monitoring

• Track reassignments and retirements of FBI Special Agents in Charge (SACs) in battleground states

• Compile public comments, whistleblower statements, and Inspector General reports linked to Jan. 6 cases

• Investigate DOJ personnel who coordinated with FBI leadership on Capitol Siege prosecutions

• Prepare witness lists of agents resisting disclosure orders for potential testimony

VI. Conclusion

The current personnel realignment within the FBI represents more than a bureaucratic reshuffling—it is a critical inflection point in the long-standing conflict between entrenched bureaucratic ideologues and constitutional oversight. Whether the outcome becomes restorative or retributive will depend on how effectively future investigations illuminate the institutional mechanisms used to politicize federal law enforcement during and after the Trump presidency.

CLASSIFIED: INTERNAL USE ONLY