Florida Conservative

The order, though brief and devoid of a named author, carries sweeping implications—not just for immigration enforcement, but for the integrity and reputation of the American judiciary itself. In what may be remembered as a strategic fumble, the Court failed to show institutional courage, delivering instead a non-committal pause wrapped in procedural caution.

One might argue that the natural check on bad rulings lies within the judiciary itself. The Supreme Court or appellate courts could, in theory, dismiss repeat legal challenges with statements like “asked and answered” or “duplicative of prior rulings.” And while this might sound ideal, the reality is more complex.

If there is credible evidence that a lower court judge is complicit in corruption, the executive branch can:

While Biden's proposals include plausible ethical reforms, the broader context suggests an attempt at a significant power shift within the f

As AOC and the Squad press forward with impeachment articles, the spotlight on judicial ethics shines brightly on both sides of the ideologi

NEWS ITEMS THAT WILL BE IMPORTANT IN THE NEXT WEEKS

Supreme Court rules against affirmative action in college, other legal issues and human trafficking gets a film in "Sound of Freedom"