Florida Conservative

In a landmark decision issued today, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) ruled against the Trump Administration’s “Liberation Day” tariffs. Framing them as an overreach of executive authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), the court permanently enjoined the tariffs’ enforcement. On its face, the ruling appears to protect small business and constitutional order. But beneath the surface lies a more cynical possib

The order, though brief and devoid of a named author, carries sweeping implications—not just for immigration enforcement, but for the integrity and reputation of the American judiciary itself. In what may be remembered as a strategic fumble, the Court failed to show institutional courage, delivering instead a non-committal pause wrapped in procedural caution.

This paper examines the case of U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani's decision to issue a stay on the Biden-era CHNV (Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, Venezuela) humanitarian parole program's termination. T

One might argue that the natural check on bad rulings lies within the judiciary itself. The Supreme Court or appellate courts could, in theory, dismiss repeat legal challenges with statements like “asked and answered” or “duplicative of prior rulings.” And while this might sound ideal, the reality is more complex.

As AOC and the Squad press forward with impeachment articles, the spotlight on judicial ethics shines brightly on both sides of the ideologi

It only takes a cursory watch of the news outlets to know that the United States is in trouble. Our "elected" officials spend absolutely...

never before in our country has the apparatus of the legal system been used to such ends. Law fare cometh