THE INEVITABLE ALIEN ISSUE. THE USA NEEDS A SOUND IMMIGRATION POLICY, OR DOES IT ALREADY HAVE ONE?
- lhpgop
- Mar 24
- 10 min read

"It is undeniable that forced migration and displacement is a “weapon of war.” To understand the ever-escalating refugee crisis in the world today and how it might be addressed, it is necessary to examine its “root cause(s).” Organized political violence in the form of either war or protracted armed conflict or oppressive dictatorial authoritarianism or totalitarianism are the prime drivers of forced migration and displacement in the world today."
James C. Simeon, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/human-dynamics/articles/10.3389/fhumd.2023.1172954/full
There are any number of different theories in circulation on how to address the problem of this largest of illegal migrant waves to have hit Western Civilization. Is it culutral? economic? sociological? are there cultures in decline and others on the move up? Way to many to deal with in any amount of short articles. However, we are looking at this unprecedented assault on the West as one that has more aspects of war than of anything else.
The use of "hoardes of the displacd" as been used in war for ccenturies but it is only now with all other factors of transport, logistics, media propoganda, etc. that it has been able to become the single most destabilizing force in modern combat. Most of which seems to have been aided if not initiated by elements within the government of the host nations.
This is all part of an overall coup of the West that has had great but varying success. It has almost toppled a number of European governments (time will tell on that) as well as having wreaked havoc on both the US government and it's citizenry that in some places in the country one feels the wrath of these glogalist terrorists.
"The illegals are here to stay" is the chant from the socialists and as we, the United States of America, is just sitting on trillions of dollars, we should share our largesse with these helpless foreign individuals. Obviously, they will be more grateful and vote to keep the globalists in charge but that is a story for another article.
Lett's take a look at what can be done to stem the tide of this unncessary wave and get the US back on track. We can address a number of the socialist's questions as we go.
There should be NO borders, anywhere, people are citizens of the world and should be free to flow back in forth like human driftwood or locusts and clutter up areas of productivity in the search for 'Free" social benefits.
There is no system in place that allows for these lawbreakers (that's why they are illegal) to deal with them and allow them to come into the USA and, once again, glom off of the social support network.
Why isn't the US government (fascists) doing everything it can to extend the rights of citizens to the illegals while they are in the USA's detention facilities
That's a big lie about them being here for the welfare... they are doing the jobs that US citizen's won't do!
The US government will never be able to deport them all, so let's just give them an amnesty like was done in 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) – IRCA granted amnesty to 3 million undocumented immigrants
"When civilian non-combatants are weaponized in the context of war or protracted armed conflict, it is a deliberate effort to gain outright military advantage to obtain, ultimately, military victory. Weaponizing civilian non-combatants will inevitably trigger mass forced displacement."(Simeon and van Sliedregt, 2019)

So now that we have some questions to answer. This is not a definitive list, but the ones most likely to be heard parroted from either side with emphasis on the socialist talking points.
In no certain order.
Without borders, a country ceases to exist. If a country ceases to exist, the institutions of said country dissolve and this makes it impossible for all the stateless people to get their FREE benefits. Unless you overthrow all of the governments and forge a new one whose priority is the doling out of FREE benefits. Truly.
If you don't come into a country in an orderly fashion and cannot provide the givers of FREE things to you, then how will the givers of FREE things know that 1. You are on the list for FREE things (entitled) and 2. that you aren't abusing the system by taking 2 or 3 times the amount of FREE. Remember, there are other stateless people in line behind you. Be kind.
There is nothing in place with the US governement that allows for people to come in to do the jobs that US citizen don't want to do.
See below:
The U.S. guest worker program allows foreign nationals to temporarily work in the country under nonimmigrant visas. The program primarily operates under two major visa categories:
1. Agricultural Guest Worker Program (H-2A Visa)
Designed specifically for seasonal agricultural workers.
Employers must prove there are not enough U.S. workers available for the jobs.
Workers must return to their home countries after their contract ends.
Housing and transportation are usually provided by employers.
Employers must adhere to wage and working condition protections.
2. Non-Agricultural Guest Worker Program (H-2B Visa)
Covers seasonal or temporary non-agricultural jobs (e.g., hospitality, landscaping, construction, seafood processing).
Employers must prove there’s a labor shortage.
Limited to 66,000 visas per year (subject to possible increases by the government).
No housing requirements for employers (unlike H-2A).
Key Differences
Feature | H-2A (Agricultural) | H-2B (Non-Agricultural) |
Industry | Farming, harvesting | Hospitality, construction, landscaping |
Housing Provided? | Yes (required) | No (not required) |
Annual Cap | No limit | 66,000 visas per year |
Duration | Up to 1 year, renewable | Up to 1 year, renewable |
Wages & Protections | Strict regulations | Fewer protections |
The actual problem is that fact that the US is still having tone deafness about upgrading the Welfare System as installed by Lyndon Johnson. That segment of the 'Great Society has to be addressed or the nation's percentage of people that are permanently dependent upon government assistance will find itself so far behind that when the upcoming employment boom hits, they will be unable to fill even the most menial jobs and then will be without work and with benefits and then you will have a serious issue.
Thomas Sowell
This failure of the United States to deal with immigration issues has plagued us for quite some time. It is now under the microscope and shouted through the halls due to the fact the United States is in financial straits and the years of free money without question have to come to an end. The US must look inward to our own citizens first and foremost.
Here are summaries of the USA's moves in the immigration world.
the system heavily restricted non-European migration. The 1924 Immigration Act imposed strict quotas, significantly reducing overall immigration.
Post-WWII (1950s–1960s) – Immigration levels were relatively low due to restrictive policies like the Bracero Program (1942–1964), which regulated temporary Mexican laborers. The system functioned more predictably but was highly exclusionary.
1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) – IRCA granted amnesty to 3 million undocumented immigrants and increased border enforcement. However, it failed to prevent further illegal immigration due to weak employer sanctions.
1990s–Early 2000s – The 1990 Immigration Act increased legal immigration caps, and border security was ramped up. The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (1996) further tightened enforcement, but unauthorized immigration remained high.
No "Perfect" Period
While some decades had better enforcement or processing systems, no time fully "adequately" handled all aspects of immigration. There was always a gap between policy intentions and real-world outcomes.
Focusing on the current era. 2019 to 2025
This is the period that we can say is our "battleground" time period "The Great Wave"
Between 2019 and 2025, the U.S. immigration system faced significant challenges in managing both legal and illegal immigration flows. During President Trump's first term (2017–2021), policies such as the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP), also known as the "Remain in Mexico" policy, were implemented. This program required asylum seekers to await their U.S. immigration court hearings in Mexico, leading to logistical and humanitarian challenges. American Immigration Council
The COVID-19 pandemic further strained the system, causing backlogs and delays in immigration processing. By the end of 2024, the immigration court backlog had grown to approximately 3.6 million cases, up from around 200,000 in 2006.This increase was due to factors such as changing migration patterns, increased enforcement, and pandemic-related disruptions. CT Insider
In President Trump's second term (beginning in 2025), efforts intensified to deport millions of undocumented immigrants.This led to overcrowding in detention facilities, with over 46,000 detainees held in a system designed for no more than 40,000. Conditions in these facilities deteriorated, and legal challenges increased. Axios
Additionally, programs initiated under previous administrations, such as the humanitarian parole program that provided two-year work permits to migrants from countries like Venezuela and Nicaragua, were terminated. Participants in these programs faced deportation despite initially entering the U.S. legally. WSJ
Overall, during this period, the U.S. immigration system struggled with enforcement challenges, processing delays, and shifting political priorities, indicating that it was not fully adequate to manage the complexities of legal and illegal immigration flows.
We can sit here and disprove any number of leftists points, but it doesn;t point to any solutions. The globalists in the Democratic party are going to fight tooth and nail to stall this immigration deportation operation so that Trump will come to the negotiating table and naturalize these miscreants. That Congress still hasn't made any untoward noises about policy change should concern the citizens.
I will put this out there as a starting point. Below are some of the major points of one of the strongest "guest worker" programs in the world. That of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, apt as we have so many illegals from that part of the world, so here it is.
The Kafala system is a sponsorship-based labor migration framework used in Saudi Arabia and other Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. Under this system, foreign workers must have a Saudi employer (kafeel) who sponsors their work and residency in the country. The sponsor controls aspects of the worker’s legal status, including employment, visa renewals, and exit permissions (though reforms have eased some restrictions in recent years).
Strengths of the Kafala System
1. National Security
Strict Immigration Oversight – Since every foreign worker is tied to a specific sponsor, the government can track and regulate the entry, stay, and movement of immigrants, reducing risks of unauthorized migration and illegal residency.
Controlled Workforce Entry – Employers must secure visas and contracts for workers before arrival, ensuring that only those with verified job offers enter the country.
2. Accountability of Immigrants
Employer Responsibility – Sponsors are legally responsible for their workers, making it easier to monitor behavior, employment status, and compliance with labor laws.
Reduced Risk of Unemployment & Public Burden – Workers cannot switch jobs freely, preventing them from remaining in the country without employment or accessing public welfare systems.
3. Ability to Repatriate Workers
Easier Deportation & Exit Control – Employers can terminate sponsorship and request deportation of workers who violate contracts or laws, ensuring swift repatriation of undocumented or non-compliant individuals.
Minimized Risk of Permanent Settlement – Since workers have temporary status and no direct pathway to citizenship, the system prevents large-scale permanent migration that could strain resources.
Now look at it in contrast to the US system.
The Saudi Kafala system and the U.S. guest worker system (H-2A/H-2B visas) are both temporary labor migration programs, but they differ significantly in structure, oversight, and worker rights.
Feature | Saudi Kafala System | U.S. Guest Worker System (H-2A/H-2B) |
Sponsorship & Oversight | Workers must be sponsored by a Saudi employer (kafeel), who controls their legal status. | Employers petition for visas, but workers have more legal protections and government oversight. |
Worker Mobility | Workers cannot change jobs without employer approval (some reforms allow it in limited cases). | Workers can change employers under specific conditions (e.g., contract violations, filing complaints). |
Exit & Repatriation | Workers require employer permission to leave the country (recent reforms allow exit without permission in some cases). | Workers can leave the U.S. without employer approval but must return after visa expiration. |
National Security | Strict tracking of foreign workers ensures controlled entry and exit, reducing illegal overstays. | More flexible entry/exit, but enforcement relies on border security and visa monitoring. |
Accountability of Immigrants | Employer fully responsible for worker’s conduct, ensuring direct oversight and compliance. | Government agencies (DHS, DOL) enforce labor laws, rather than placing full responsibility on employers. |
Ability to Repatriate | Easy deportation if a worker’s sponsorship is revoked, reducing risk of long-term unauthorized stay. | Deportation requires formal immigration proceedings, which can be lengthy and complex. |
Path to Residency/Citizenship | No path to permanent residency or citizenship for foreign workers. | Some workers may adjust status (e.g., via employer sponsorship for a green card). |
Key Differences & Implications
Stronger National Security Control (Kafala System):Saudi Arabia’s strict tracking of foreign workers makes it easier to monitor and repatriate migrants, reducing illegal overstays and unauthorized employment. The U.S. system relies more on border control and visa tracking, which can result in undocumented immigration.
Greater Worker Flexibility (U.S. System):The U.S. guest worker system provides legal protections, the ability to change jobs, and government oversight, reducing employer dependency and exploitation. Saudi Arabia’s system historically tied workers more directly to employers, though recent reforms have granted limited mobility.
Repatriation Efficiency (Kafala System):In Saudi Arabia, workers can be swiftly deported if their employer cancels sponsorship. In the U.S., deportation involves legal procedures, which can be slow and expensive, leading to millions of undocumented immigrants staying long-term.
Conclusion
The Kafala system prioritizes national security, strict accountability, and efficient repatriation but has been criticized for worker dependency and rights concerns. The U.S. system offers greater worker protections but faces challenges with enforcement and long-term illegal immigration.
This conclusion is that one that the United States has to start taking into account. The kafala system stresses national security, strict accountability and efficient repatriation.
The royal family knows the type of people who are lurking out there waiting for a chance to get lost in the crowd. Lost until it is time to surface.
Wile you may disagree on these programs, I would put it to you to look into them and also contact your Congressman and Senator as to what type of programs they are working on.
We are all together in this House of War, let's start acting like it.
Comments