top of page

ISRAELI ATTACKING HEZBOLLAH? NOT IF BUT WHEN


CONTINUES TO FIRE ROCKETS INTO ISRAEL
HEXBOLLAH IN LEBANON

  JUNE 7, 20204 13:09


Frank from Iron Age News offers a detailed narrative of the crucial factors potentially driving the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) to consider an attack on Hezbollah in Lebanon. The segment covers multiple aspects of the geopolitical landscape and domestic concerns.

Key Factors Pushing the IDF Toward Hezbollah

1. Israeli Military Operations in Gaza

Frank emphasizes that the ongoing operations in Rafah, Gaza, signal an intensified military campaign. With six brigades reportedly active in Rafah, the IDF is trying to secure the border and eliminate threats from tunnel complexes, suggesting an aggressive stance that could easily extend into Lebanon after operational success in Gaza.

2. Hezbollah as an Iranian Proxy

Hezbollah, described as a tentacle of the Iranian octopus, is perceived as a significant threat due to its backing by Iran. With Iran facing internal turmoil, including a leadership vacuum since their president's death, the need to demonstrate military strength might pressure Israel to curb Hezbollah's influence, especially given Iran's precarious situation.

3. Disinformation and Media Muddle

Frank mentions widespread disinformation, muddying the actual progress and events in Gaza, exacerbating the tensions and complexities around Israeli military actions. Trust issues make Israel wary, pushing them toward decisive military action to control the narrative.

4. Reports of Attacks from Yemen and Iraq

Despite reports being termed absurd, missile threats purportedly from Yemen and Iraq highlight the growing perception of encirclement by hostile forces. Even if unconfirmed, such claims maintain a state of alert and agitation in Israel.

5. US-Israeli Relations and Double-Dealings

Frank expresses deep mistrust towards the Biden administration, accused of negotiating duplicitously with Hamas and showing unreliable support to Israel. The distrust could compel Israel to take unilateral military action rather than relying on inconsistent diplomatic assurances from the United States.

6. Historical Context and Terrorism Dynamics

Israel’s past experiences, such as swapping many political prisoners for a few hostages—like Hamas’ commander Shinwa—underscore the need for a firm grip on security, possibly prompting pre-emptive strikes on Hezbollah to avoid future threats.

7. Internal Israeli and Regional Politics


The presence of factions within Israel’s government discussing peace terms adversely affects Israel's standing. These internal splits, compounded by historical animosities and faulty peace deals, underline the necessity for a united front through assertive actions, possibly against Hezbollah.


8. Strategic and Tactical Considerations


Frank outlines potential military strategies, noting that Hezbollah claims significant manpower (up to 100,000 fighters), though estimates vary. The ability of the IDF to deploy substantial air and ground forces effectively and to eliminate Hezbollah’s supply lines remains pivotal in planning any operations in Lebanon.


9. Broad Geopolitical Instability


Drawing parallels with historical conflicts like the Iraq-Iran war, Frank underscores a pattern of entrenched warfare shifted geographically. This backdrop perpetuates a cycle of violence that may spiral into further confrontations, suggesting imminent Israeli actions against Hezbollah as part of this continuum.


10. Misaligned International Responses


The perception of skewed international support—favoring Hamas in diplomatic rhetoric while undercutting Israel militarily—creates a precarious security environment. Israel’s need for dependable defense mechanisms against overlapping threats from Iran, Yemen, Iraq, and Hezbollah necessitates proactive military safeguards.


Conclusion


Frank's narrative weaves these elements into a scenario where Israel, besieged by regional adversaries, unreliable allies, and historical precedents, might find it essential to strike Hezbollah in Lebanon. Preemptive action could be viewed not only as a tactical necessity but also as a strategic imperative to stabilize regional dynamics and ensure national security.


SEE FULL VIDEO BELOW




Comments


bottom of page