Florida Conservative

Employers argued that allowing unvaccinated religious objectors would cause an undue hardship by endangering patients. If the underlying assumption—“vaccination prevents spread”—is disproven, the hardship becomes speculative rather than substantial. Under Groff v. DeJoy, 600 U.S. 447 (2023), a hardship must be “substantial in the context of the employer’s business.” Evidence that vaccinated and unvaccinated staff transmitted equally would significantly weaken that defense and

No serious observer of American politics can still believe that Donald Trump could receive a fair trial in New York City.It isn’t merely that jurors there lean left — though 85 percent of the city’s electorate voted against him. The deeper problem is cultural saturation: the Stormy Daniels saga, the endless parade of unnamed “accusers,” and half a decade of negative coverage created a civic environment in which impartiality was impossible long before voir dire began.

The order, though brief and devoid of a named author, carries sweeping implications—not just for immigration enforcement, but for the integrity and reputation of the American judiciary itself. In what may be remembered as a strategic fumble, the Court failed to show institutional courage, delivering instead a non-committal pause wrapped in procedural caution.

If there is credible evidence that a lower court judge is complicit in corruption, the executive branch can:

Supreme Court rules against affirmative action in college, other legal issues and human trafficking gets a film in "Sound of Freedom"