Florida Conservative

No serious observer of American politics can still believe that Donald Trump could receive a fair trial in New York City.It isn’t merely that jurors there lean left — though 85 percent of the city’s electorate voted against him. The deeper problem is cultural saturation: the Stormy Daniels saga, the endless parade of unnamed “accusers,” and half a decade of negative coverage created a civic environment in which impartiality was impossible long before voir dire began.

The order, though brief and devoid of a named author, carries sweeping implications—not just for immigration enforcement, but for the integrity and reputation of the American judiciary itself. In what may be remembered as a strategic fumble, the Court failed to show institutional courage, delivering instead a non-committal pause wrapped in procedural caution.

If there is credible evidence that a lower court judge is complicit in corruption, the executive branch can:

Supreme Court rules against affirmative action in college, other legal issues and human trafficking gets a film in "Sound of Freedom"